Re: [Biopython] dblp searches

Peter Cock <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:16:25 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.bio.general
Message-ID <CAKVJ-_42zQ+KUk1EV19yb1DRK52y+MSwr1uzOzMhwfo0D4213w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Iddo,

1) I don't know.
2) I am not a lawyer, but I think that would be OK if it is just plain MIT
license. i.e.  incorporate the file with its own licensing header and
copyright statement. I suspect we have/had precedent already, but a quick
search on GitHub didn't find it.

Peter

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 10:55 PM Iddo Friedberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Not sure how much interest this has, but there is a Python wrapper for the
> dblp api. I forked it, added functionality, and converted to Python 3. The
> original github repository does not have a license, but the steup.py lists
> MIT as the license.
>
> 1) Is there any interest in incorporating this into Biopython? It is
> essentially complementary to the pubmed search tool, for publications not
> indexed in Pubmed but indexed in DBLP.
>
> 2) If so, do we have a licensing issue?
>
> The DBLP API: https://dblp.org/faq/How+to+use+the+dblp+search+API.html
>
> Code (my fork with the added stuff): https://github.com/idoerg/dblp-python
>
> Original repo: https://github.com/scholrly/dblp-python
>
> Iddo
>
> --
> Iddo Friedberg
> http://iddo-friedberg.net/contact.html
> ++++++++++[>+++>++++++>++++++++>++++++++++>+++++++++++<<<<<-]>>>>++++.>
> ++++++..----.<<<<++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.-----------..>>>+.-----.
> .>-.<<<<--.>>>++.>+++.<+++.----.-.<++++++++++++++++++.>+.>.<++.<<<+.>>
> >>----.<--.>++++++.<<<<------------------------------------.
> _______________________________________________
> Biopython mailing list  -  [email protected]
> https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython
>

_______________________________________________
Biopython mailing list  -  [email protected]
https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython