Re: A modest proposal for securing PyPI with TUF

On 3/13/13 8:11 PM, Trishank Karthik Kuppusamy wrote:
>
> Speaking of which, it may be the case that our design document for
> integrating PyPI with TUF may not be terribly easy to understand. (After
> all, you do need to understand TUF first, but TUF is fairly easy once
> you understand its main ideas.) I plan to publish a friendlier document
> which introduce TUF at a very high-level and instead discuss more
> pragmatic issues (such as workflows).

We presented a lightning talk on PyPI + TUF + pip at PyCon yesterday, 
and perhaps it would make things easier to understand:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sx1lS6cT3g

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FMptD5sMH41BTgS3-PN0-7j5Zqvs_zZZ3ntsD_4u-7w/edit?usp=sharing