Re: Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig
Donald Stufft <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:42:07 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.catalog,gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1602285978== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4D3CE8DA-6F80-4E95-B891-A5CDFF977298"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 --Apple-Mail=_4D3CE8DA-6F80-4E95-B891-A5CDFF977298 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On Mar 28, 2013, at 3:39 PM, PJ Eby <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Fred Drake <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Donald Stufft <[email protected]> = wrote: >>> Is there much point in keeping catalog-sig and distutils-sig = separate? >>=20 >> No. >>=20 >> The last time this was brought up, there were objections, but I don't >> remember what they were. I'll let people who think there's a point >> worry about that. >>=20 >>> Not sure if there's some official process for requesting it or not, = but >>> I think we should merge the two lists and just make packaging-sig to >>> umbrella the entire packaging topics. >>=20 >> There is the meta-sig, but the description is out-dated: >>=20 >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/meta-sig >>=20 >> and the last message in the archives is dated 2011, and sparked no >> discussion: >>=20 >> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/meta-sig/2011-June.txt >>=20 >> +1 on merging the lists. >=20 > Can we do it by just dropping catalog-sig and keeping distutils-sig? > I'm afraid we might lose some important distutils-sig population if > the process involves renaming the list, resubscribing, etc. I also > *really* don't want to invalidate archive links to the distutils-sig > archive. >=20 > All in all, +1 on not having two lists, but I'm really worried about > "breaking" distutils-sig. We're still going to be talking about > "distribution utilities", after all. Don't care how it's done. I don't know Mailman enough to know what is = possible or how easy things are. I thought packaging-sig sounded nice = but if you can't rename + redirect or merge or something in mailman I'm = down for whatever. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 = DCFA --Apple-Mail=_4D3CE8DA-6F80-4E95-B891-A5CDFF977298 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRVJ0PAAoJEG48vOkzctz6snkP/1FKJJ+I3sup/gKiIjxwHqJY nKsONdV8HevLS9DRWekSBloAfXZb8/nzObHoDXtxkWOTt2sbYp8aW5nP33y80zge je2frUhFPolj/qzvxd9SxpnaH2F5gcSBNFtCtYmrz82AACADUDLrjGvZFv8EJQvZ hLDcRvu8f0g6MHSq357gnskwErI2/cIqDscotgQuWkZR6LVXaSK1ES4jqfPH9V07 4P0QKbVqPUOee8iKSTkq5kGsBcAlJc7CsWFBaZRy+A6RXK8F8ELdA7ePJ8Pnblz0 fbUTwpaeUX3O1aRmusoVcFr+KNUJl2GtulsRptmMHDQBTxEGrHxzsImUhL/PASDc 6EFnbR++fhvZ6avNV2V1sytbGArxqr/BAumDjjQQUSw97QQSJQU+Brmua7cck4iV Sy6yldKU3Ca5+E5VJ4uLLKllX9/a8zaz7wNxqgoJ+XNx37gyMwZ0iZy38aHfPNAV L3HpSY7wPmVVKo9qDyLcRQNyNhGC6xu19lLvT2yfxUkd6/JiWM2Dm2AhpXmXRogk a2k30JUySRNvvKTRs5ZCR5jif/Fl549d4hrJjAqmcO9pIPGMs9wXT8lj3CVAWHYv DA1nsc58X7fwzx/K1nhe20e7FEiZVH0T/zFGX23jpb1zdGfExOjWWtMBOr3nN7td ZVXbD8ttuYubLO29eJiF =y+Zz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_4D3CE8DA-6F80-4E95-B891-A5CDFF977298-- --===============1602285978== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig --===============1602285978==--