Re: Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig

Donald Stufft <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:42:07 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.catalog,gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============1602285978==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4D3CE8DA-6F80-4E95-B891-A5CDFF977298"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1


--Apple-Mail=_4D3CE8DA-6F80-4E95-B891-A5CDFF977298
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1


On Mar 28, 2013, at 3:39 PM, PJ Eby <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Fred Drake <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Donald Stufft <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>>> Is there much point in keeping catalog-sig and distutils-sig =
separate?
>>=20
>> No.
>>=20
>> The last time this was brought up, there were objections, but I don't
>> remember what they were.  I'll let people who think there's a point
>> worry about that.
>>=20
>>> Not sure if there's some official process for requesting it or not, =
but
>>> I think we should merge the two lists and just make packaging-sig to
>>> umbrella the entire packaging topics.
>>=20
>> There is the meta-sig, but the description is out-dated:
>>=20
>>    http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/meta-sig
>>=20
>> and the last message in the archives is dated 2011, and sparked no
>> discussion:
>>=20
>>    http://mail.python.org/pipermail/meta-sig/2011-June.txt
>>=20
>> +1 on merging the lists.
>=20
> Can we do it by just dropping catalog-sig and keeping distutils-sig?
> I'm afraid we might lose some important distutils-sig population if
> the process involves renaming the list, resubscribing, etc.  I also
> *really* don't want to invalidate archive links to the distutils-sig
> archive.
>=20
> All in all, +1 on not having two lists, but I'm really worried about
> "breaking" distutils-sig.  We're still going to be talking about
> "distribution utilities", after all.

Don't care how it's done. I don't know Mailman enough to know what is =
possible or how easy things are. I thought packaging-sig sounded nice =
but if you can't rename + redirect or merge or something in mailman I'm =
down for whatever.

-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 =
DCFA


--Apple-Mail=_4D3CE8DA-6F80-4E95-B891-A5CDFF977298
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
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=y+Zz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_4D3CE8DA-6F80-4E95-B891-A5CDFF977298--

--===============1602285978==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig

--===============1602285978==--