Re: Is CherryPy dead?

I've mostly done the NGINX thing, though I have used uwsgi for some small
apps, I think for small sites, nginx is fine, but when you start to need
more than one GIL, uWSGI steps in nicely. Beats having multiple config
files and supervisor for managing all those processes, the orchestration of
which has caused a number of problems in trying to build a zero downtime
deployment system.

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:20 AM irrgit <[email protected]> wrote:

> Apologies for the double post.  I like the part where it just works and
> doesn't get in your way. I will also try to learn Django and/or Flask.
> Another question came to mind.
>
> Is there a need to use uWSGI with CherryPy? Usually i just put nginx in
> front and be done. But Ive seen  setups with uWSGI as well.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "cherrypy-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to cherrypy-users+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected]
> To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected]
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cherrypy-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cherrypy-users+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected]
To post to this group, send email to cherrypy-users-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cherrypy-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.