Re: Assign nodes

[Jeremy]

>It looks like the code generator, as you mentioned, has to distinguish
>between store and del anyway.  So getting rid of the special case for
>load, just means making it a three part default test.
>
>As it happens, the case of names is handled by three separate methods
>-- loadName(), storeName(), and delName() -- that are called from the
>visitor.  So the separate node types doesn't really buy anything.
>
>Does the following patch look good?

At first glance it seems to be exactly what I needed. I'll take a closer
look tomorrow.

regards,
finn