Re: Re: [PSF-Members] Python11 at OSCON2003
Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> Wed, 22 May 2002 21:38:33 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.conferences |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Well, let's at least try to get "Python Software Foundation" in > there. Some exposure will certainly be good for us; at least from > the standpoint of noting that we *exist*, are a non-profit, and > willing to accept donations :-) Will do. > >... > > > I'll note that the Apache Software Foundation has made on the order > > > of $100k over the past two/three years from its conferences. In > > > fact, we had a notable lack of income last year when our conference > > > organizer folded, and we had to cancel the Con. > > > > There are may ways to look at that information less than favorably. > > Heh. I presume you meant "many", but I can only think of one: the > conference was quite expensive for the attendees. I'd be interested > in other "less than favorably" aspects you have in mind. It would be > great feedback! Yes, I meant many. I was thinking that perhaps the organizer gave too much back to the ASF and went out of business as a result. More likely, they were a simple victim of the bursting internet bubble. > But even so with the higher cost than the Foretech/IPC conferences, > the speakers got *paid* for being there (flight cost, per diem, and > (of course) free entrance to the conference, etc). Even after that, > money was still available for the ASF. I've always been amazed that > the IPC conferences never generated positive cash. It just doesn't > seem right :-) OSCON gives all speakers free registration; tutorial speakers and VIPs I believe get paid or get a free trip. (I assume Larry Wall gets paid royally.) > > > While the ASF arguably has a larger and broader interest base than > > > the PSF, I don't see a specific reason why a PSF conference could > > > not generate proceeds for us. > > > > Because it never made money in the past? > > See above. This just amazes me :-) Yet it's a simple matter of numbers. The number of people who can convince their boss to pay for their trip to a Python conference is much smaller than for an Apache conference. While a lot of the cost is per attendee (like the food), there's also a lot of fixed cost (e.g. projector rent). Plus, for a larger conference you can get more money from sponsors. Since this will be your first conference since the bubble burst, it will be interesting to see how it goes. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)