[Fwd: Re: added feature to setup.py]

Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:49:52 -0800
From: Matthew Rodriguez DSD staff <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Heikki Toivonen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: added feature to setup.py
References: <[email protected]>                       <[email protected]>            <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Heikki Toivonen wrote:

>>>On 11/7/05, Matthew Rodriguez DSD staff <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I'm using the 0.15 branch.
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>I have been really puzzled by people claiming to use 0.15 and having
>const problems with various OpenSSL versions, when I believe I fixed all
>of them up to OpenSSL 0.9.8 in 0.15.
>
>Now I think found the reason.
>
>The 0.15 *branch* in the Subversion repository is not the same as the
>0.15 *tag*. In fact, 0.15 development happened on the trunk exclusively,
>and the *tag* was created from the *trunk*. Or in other words, 0.15
>development was never on the 0.15 *branch*.
>
>This is partly a fault of mine. When I release 0.15 I forgot there was
>this misleading branch that was not even used and I should have deleted
>it and created the correct 0.15 branch.
>
>Could you please confirm if you were using the bad branch or the correct
>tag?
>
>Correct: http://svn.osafoundation.org/m2crypto/tags/0.15/
>Bad:     http://svn.osafoundation.org/m2crypto/branches/0.15/
>
>
>Also, if I won't hear any objections I will be nuking the current bad
>branch and creating a correct one from the 0.15 tag within the next
>couple of days.
>
>  
>

I was using the bad branch. The patch I submitted to setup.py doesn't 
work with
this tag, which is what Guido was asking about earlier. I'll submit 
another patch that
works with the head.

Thanks for clearing up the confusion

Matt Rodriguez