Re: [psycopg] #203: Timestamps "BC" raise "ValueError: second must be in 0..59"

"psycopg" <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.db.psycopg.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
#203: Timestamps "BC" raise "ValueError: second must be in 0..59"
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  hdiogenes  |        Owner:  fog          
     Type:  defect     |       Status:  new          
 Priority:  normal     |    Milestone:  PSYCOPG 2.0.6
Component:  psycopg2   |      Version:  2.0.2        
 Severity:  normal     |   Resolution:               
 Keywords:             |  
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by jamesh):

 The Python datetime type does not seem to support BC dates:

   {{{
 >>> from datetime import date, timedelta
 >>> dt = date(1,1,1)
 >>> dt.isoformat()
 '0001-01-01'
 >>> dt - timedelta(days=1)
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
 OverflowError: date value out of range
 }}}

 So it isn't just a simple matter of adding code to interpret the "BC"
 suffix.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://initd.org/tracker/psycopg/ticket/203#comment:1>
psycopg <http://initd.org/>
psycopg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.