Re: #203: Timestamps "BC" raise "ValueError: second must be in 0..59"

On 15/01/2008, Tim Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:
> James Henstridge wrote:
> > There is mxDateTime support in psycopg2, so perhaps fixing the parsing
> > code to handle BC would be enough when it is compiled in that mode.
> >
>
> But if you use the mxDateTime support, I thought it used mxDateTime for
> the parsing, so it should Just Work.  Have you tried it?

Yes, I did try it.

The same parsing code is used for both the datetime and mx.DateTime
cases.  I've got a partially complete patch that should help here
(produce a "year is out of range" error for datetime, and correct
results for mx.DateTime).  I'll post it when it works and has tests.

James.