Re: #203: Timestamps "BC" raise "ValueError: second must be in 0..59"

On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 07:53:12AM +0900, James Henstridge wrote:

> """
> Dates before the Epoch are handled by extrapolating the calendars
> using negative years as basis (the year 1 BCE corresponds to the year
> 0, 2 BCE is represented as year -1 and so on).
> """
> 
> So it is the documented behaviour rather than a bug.

IOW it's a known bug.

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346