Re: Large binary data [was: contrib: hack for psycopg2 performance]
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> Wed, 12 May 2010 15:27:55 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.db.psycopg.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 02:12:20PM +0100, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > > Not really (beyond the one the OP posted). Common > > (PostgreSQL) wisdom holds that it is advantageous when > > dealing with significant amounts of truly binary data (such > > as bytea) - which I am (medical documents). > > Aren't large objects more suitable to deal with them? It much depends. You wanted bytea if you wanted transactional control. That has been improving somewhat recently with PG 9.0. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346