Re: conn.close() idempotence
James William Pye <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.db |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:36 PM, Michael Bayer wrote: > I'm +1 for close() on a closed connection being harmless. rollback() already has this behavior, as the spec specifies "rolls back the start of any pending transaction", thus allowing for no activity if no transaction is present. yep.. +1 cheers, jwp _______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig