Re: asyncio support
Michael Bayer <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:14:05 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.db |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 12, 2013, at 9:51 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[email protected]> wrote: > > For mxODBC Connect, we've implemented gevent compatibility, > so you can use async processing without having to change > your code - which IMHO is the nicest way to do async > processing :-) though sadly just doesn’t seem to be catching on, as the rise of systems like Node.js continue to spread the idea that you need to wrangle explicit callback spaghetti, descending fully and explicitly throughout all libraries and system calls, in order to achieve asynchronous nirvana, whatever that means. Using gevent means you don’t get to have the satisfaction of admiring your newly forged, self-satisfying maze of callbacks - it makes programming practical and boring all over again. _______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 495 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSgkW9AAoJEDMCOcHE2v7hMgcH/RUuBOqbZGmCSQu5KBe8qVx9 58LWS+aHFYJkjKdgAxJyW+RAuRGaaBTmOWgh7+d84wHvlW3pdbMAPQt/9gQ8FDIE SOrQdSJpkjxhOUSrihp4C97d6KTyevSPqqzCiVAc+s3LCOL1DLi+KBkPwxOeUmf6 yaAeyHcXTPFJsQ67CsFSr1+5x2zAKiTABe30saK4fBWx0Y6JteNi+Ms/ESeL3VSE yZuY1otpcsQkj25NaFqZNnoXPwou3NSq8C0goyIDdlK6Rd6UnUrMxHo9CQ5GIdzm uO2WSa22zzHqqWdwf32pwF4FonosNw3A1eFRVjLzB4+KDC1jEy7o+b6wCMeSpOs= =5ASf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----