Re: Accepting PEP 681 – Data Class Transforms

+1. Glad it's not just me

On 6/6/2022 2:36 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> First, I understood that "Arbitrary Literal String Type" was adding a
> new built-in types for "literal strings" :-) Nope. It's just about
> type annotations ;-)

I was also excited about the new built-in type :-)

Pablo is already separating the PEPs in new release announcements (or 
has at least agreed to, not sure any releases have happened since I asked).

But with the amount of work going on in separate venues these days, 
separating "CPython implementation" from "Language specification" from 
"Typing specification" would be helpful. (Packaging is already separate, 
but doesn't appear in release announcements anyway.)

Cheers,
Steve