Re: [Distutils]PEP 518 - pyproject.toml with no build-system.requires

I have updated PEP 518:
https://github.com/python/peps/commit/af73627e587c25b9ac6f28a0fda01953252df391#diff-f068c801ccb40fad40c0436ff1e25e3f
.

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 03:29 Bernat Gabor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Fair enough :+1: Let's go ahead with this then.
>
> > For tools (such as pip) where 2a and 2b behave differently, yes it
> would. But that's a pip implementation decision which can be made
> independently of the resolution of this discussion (the PEP allows either
> behaviour). The details of pip's behaviour have been discussed both on this
> thread and on the related pip issue that's referenced in this thread. I
> don't think it's worth rehashing that discussion again here. If you want to
> argue that pip should switch to behaviour 2a, you should pick up the
> discussion on the pip issue tracker. But be warned, I'll argue against you
> over there :-) (Not least because the legacy behaviour is available using
> --no-build-isolation, which is *precisely* for the case where you want to
> manage the build tools manually the way you are doing above).
> --
> Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/46N2F7WWSGMIQ4JHYKLW424NRQ3QPPGK/
>

--
Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/YY5GSSWU52HDGU3I3NVRSWRGU2QA4G4D/