Re: packaging guide and private packages index
Paul Moore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACac1F_SyAfZJiyiet-sxUc7PCy8cHupCC=U-qdWZf5LZ4Meuw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 30 July 2018 at 23:01, David Cournapeau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I see that there is almost no mention of private packages index in the > packaging guide, and no recommendation on what to use. > > Currently googling for private packages mostly return obsolete (and not very > practical) recommendations based on dependency links. > > In 2018, what would be the recommended practices for teams that develop > private packages that depend on each other ? That's a very good point, and I think it would be a really useful addition to the packaging guide. I believe the most commonly recommended approach is to use a local,devpi instance as a private index, but in terms of development workflow around that basis, I don't really know that there's much in the way of a consensus. (I should say that I don't work in an environment like this myself, so my comments are based purely on what I've heard, not on personal experience). Paul -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/QVRQV2MILNRNWZOUXLHTTSS6U5HY3WTA/