Re: Opinions on requiring younger glibc in manylinux1 wheel?
Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPJVwBk_8hK8_oyc8Zr=rcTdfPcxxue_hqSjpuneZuRUgju3Eg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018, 08:25 Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > According to recent messages, it seems manylinux2010 won't be ready soon. > However, the baseline software in manylinux1 is becoming very old. As an > example, a popular C++ library (Abseil - https://abseil.io/) requires a > more recent glibc (see > https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/commit/add89fd0e4bfd7d874bb55b67f4e13bf8beca762#diff-9f9c7fefa83b53e16cd568e31f1bfcb9R81 > ). > > What do you think of publishing manylinux1 wheels that would require a > more recent glibc? This is being discussed currently for the pyarrow > package. > It's naughty, you shouldn't do it, and the energy you put into making pseudo-manylinux1 wheels could probably be better put into making finishing up the manylinux2010 work – there's not that much to do. That said, if you do do it, then probably it'll work fine and no one will notice. -n > -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VFBFG6QRETUF5NYVYB5N2Q6IMXBTMRXC/