Re: Opinions on requiring younger glibc in manylinux1 wheel?
Olivier Grisel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFvE7K7hkGB=5_nK4byeaArFZWYn4ZWwbvWZW0BxgXkxmhYZnw@mail.gmail.com> |
> I would say there's value in having two official manylinux flavors at once, for example manylinux2010 for maximum compatibility (it's already 8 years old as far as requirements go!) and manylinux2016 for recent systems compatibility. Later, manylinux2022 gets released as the "recent systems compatibility" standard and manylinux2016 becomes the "maximum compatibility" flavor. That's an interesting proposition. Would pip be able to automatically select the most recent compatible wheel when two are available on PyPI? -- Olivier -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/KT4IWSHYRF2MWRHSXQE3OYDY6RV4TWCJ/