Re: Opinions on requiring younger glibc in manylinux1 wheel?
Thomas Kluyver <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1537291566.1486245.1512437592.481C4F8D@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > It's naughty, you shouldn't do it, and the energy you put into making > > pseudo-manylinux1 wheels could probably be better put into making finishing > > up the manylinux2010 work – there's not that much to do. > > Can you explain what's missing? There's a meta-issue here for the topic: https://github.com/pypa/manylinux/issues/179 Various bits of code need to be told that manylinux2010 exists, and where necessary, have some understanding of what it means. -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/BTTE4RS2I7KN3R5337KM3L5VQEU57MXA/