Re: disable building wheel for a package

"Dan Ryan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> so the people benefiting
> are those who want a supported API for that functionality, and it
> seems only reasonable to expect them to do the job of moving the code,
> rather than expecting the pip developers to do so.

This is where I think we disagree and I feel the rhetoric is a bit harmful -- personally I don't benefit much at all, I actually don't think any individual maintainer inside the PyPA benefits much beyond having a new project to maintain, so the 'helps me vs helps you' framing isn't really the point.  If it strictly helped me to add a project to my list of things to maintain I would have done that already. The real issue here is that we all have different implementations and they create non-uniform / disjointed user experiences.  Converging on a set of common elements to extract seems like step 1

I am fairly new to the PyPA, and I don't know how any of these processes actually work.  But I do know that painting this as "us vs you" when my interest actually in helping the user of packaging tools is causing a disconnect for me anytime we engage on this -- and I'm not asking you to tackle any of this yourself, except possibly review someone's PR down the road to swap out some internals. 

Dan Ryan
gh: @techalchemy // e: [email protected]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Moore [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 6:09 PM
> To: Donald Stufft
> Cc: Dan Ryan; Thomas Kluyver; Distutils
> Subject: Re: [Distutils] disable building wheel for a package
> 
> Agreed. Furthermore, if people are of the opinion that pip's
> implementation is suitable, copying it out into packaging is likely
> not going to be at all controversial. Of course, it's not going to be
> any direct advantage to pip if that's done (we get the same
> functionality, just in a different place), so the people benefiting
> are those who want a supported API for that functionality, and it
> seems only reasonable to expect them to do the job of moving the code,
> rather than expecting the pip developers to do so.
> 
> In the case of pip's location code, more time has likely been spent
> discussing the problem than it would actually take to make the change.
> (Of course, no one person has spent that much time in discussions, but
> it adds up - coding doesn't work that way sadly).
> 
> Paul
> 

--
Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AQNFQBR3VHYCMVQRTMKAE4PIEKOP7SOT/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.