Re: Adopting virtualenv package maintenance
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADiSq7d9s+1ADhnZb9NJ+XeO2cKYcTf2tAcSBAWd1bkbzSXchw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 19:40, Bernat Gabor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > We have a few issues in tox that are essentially upstream bugs inside virtualenv. Hence, why I proposed myself to become a maintainer of virtualenv. I feel like tox is probably one of the bigger user bases out there. That seems like a pretty plausible guess to me as well, so having an overlap between the tox maintainer base and the virtualenv maintainer base would be a very good thing. It also occurs to me that one way of building a regression test suite for virtualenv would be to pick particular versions of (e.g.) tox, pew, and pipenv, and use their test suites with the development branch of virtualenv. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5WEDM6OSCPXD3RRL5GM66L6RHYXSOOKJ/