Re: Idea: perennial manylinux tag
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20181201105858.mjwa2plyhhqkxsl7@platonas> |
On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 11:23:01AM +0800, Tzu-ping Chung wrote:
> Also betraying the lack of knowledge of how this works, I read this section in
> PEP 513 (which defines manylinux1):
>
> > To be eligible for the manylinux1 platform tag, a Python wheel must therefore
> both (a) contain binary executables and compiled code that links only to
> libraries with SONAMEs included in the following list:
>
> .…
>
> libglib-2.0.so.0
>
>
>
> Does this mean that only tags down to 2.0 needs to be generated?
Note that glib and glibc are different things, despite the unfortunate
similarity in names.
Marius Gedminas
--
The world is going metric - inch by inch.
-- Michael Meeks
--
Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ENG6OZRZHPRNHMK3GS6G2I6Y4JTQZX2G/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSBIa0y8AqAlHSKbNCRV0Rd56bXjwUCXAJpbgAKCRCRV0Rd56bX jxbqAJoDHyW9xgxhs5bYG7QTwwoi2VBD1QCfVh1wjFHovrJWaOrrIwBv6YIfKIQ= =P3Tb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----