Re: Idea: perennial manylinux tag

Paul Moore <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel
Message-ID <CACac1F96YFVqi9+6ELLP8uCZaWwjTxuv-wNwE8HbveJP9wu4xg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 15:30, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 23:11, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 12:16, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > P.S. Paul asked how we can have manylinux tags without updating PEP
> > > 425 to include them, and the answer is that the actual compatibility
> > > tag spec is at https://packaging.python.org/specifications/platform-compatibility-tags/
> > > and that references PEP 513 (manylinux1) and PEP 571 (manylinux2010)
> > > in addition to PEP 425.
> >
> > Bah. I'd forgotten we had moved to putting the specs at
> > packaging.python.org (and that the tag spec had changed). Maybe there
> > should be a prominent note in PEP 425 (and any other affected specs)
> > that notes that it is no longer the reference specification, and
> > pointing to the new spec?
>
> Yeah, that's the last todo item on
> https://github.com/pypa/pypa.io/issues/11#issuecomment-195412332
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.

Well at least we now know what Guido did with the time machine when he
stepped down :-)

Paul
--
Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/HP56LSAGVD4T7ZPY2P4GNOQEERNK5V7J/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.