Re: Idea: perennial manylinux tag
Paul Moore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACac1F96YFVqi9+6ELLP8uCZaWwjTxuv-wNwE8HbveJP9wu4xg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 15:30, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 23:11, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 12:16, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > P.S. Paul asked how we can have manylinux tags without updating PEP > > > 425 to include them, and the answer is that the actual compatibility > > > tag spec is at https://packaging.python.org/specifications/platform-compatibility-tags/ > > > and that references PEP 513 (manylinux1) and PEP 571 (manylinux2010) > > > in addition to PEP 425. > > > > Bah. I'd forgotten we had moved to putting the specs at > > packaging.python.org (and that the tag spec had changed). Maybe there > > should be a prominent note in PEP 425 (and any other affected specs) > > that notes that it is no longer the reference specification, and > > pointing to the new spec? > > Yeah, that's the last todo item on > https://github.com/pypa/pypa.io/issues/11#issuecomment-195412332 > > Cheers, > Nick. Well at least we now know what Guido did with the time machine when he stepped down :-) Paul -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/HP56LSAGVD4T7ZPY2P4GNOQEERNK5V7J/