Re: API for SHA-256 fingerprints
Cooper Ry Lees <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Feb 12, 2019, at 9:57 AM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 16:28, Eric Peterson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Brilliant, that's exactly what I was looking for—both the simple API and json API look very useful. Thanks! > > Just a quick note, the simple API is required for every index server > to support, whereas the JSON API is not (yet?) standardised and may > not be supported anywhere other than PyPI (I don't know about devpi, > for example). This may not matter for your use case, but is useful to > know more generally. FYI: Bandersnatch, in a very hacky way, saves the latest JSON metadata it got to a file within the web tree and if you set NGINX (or what ever web server / proxy) to set the response type to 'application/json' you have a cut down version of the JSON API (this is - it only has the latest JSON metadata and not per version). Cooper > > Paul > -- > Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ > Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZOU33JCVN32DWHRU5MJYGOV52BE5JIR3/ -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/IT7KW6YTU4PXYAVGWLKCR2FR4HCASZAI/