PEP idea regarding non-glibc systems
Alexander Revin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAM+zL-c0oopvUkGnLdjyQz_D3dTrUj6b_BBvutai8AR2W5GbMQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi all,
I have an idea regarding Python binary wheels on non-glibc platforms,
and it seems that initially I've posted it to the wrong list ([1])
Long story short, the proposal is to use platform tuples (like
compiler ones) for wheel names, which will allow much broader platform
support, for example:
package-1.0-cp36-cp36m-amd64_linux_gnu.whl
package-1.0-cp36-cp36m-amd64_linux_musl.whl
So eventually only {platform tag} part will be modified. Glibc/musl
detection is quite trivial and eventually will be based on existing
one in PEP 513 [2].
Let me know what you think.
Best regards,
Alex
[1] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2019-February/739524.html
[2] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0513/#id49
--
Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/H3323AXRRLJAYOY2XZKS74IOUQMJUOYD/