Re: PEP-582 concerns

Steve Dower <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 20Feb.2019 0556, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> I wonder if we should stick a header on the PEP draft saying something
> like this? There's a lot of scattershot responses happening and I think
> a lot of the people reacting are lacking context.

I agree, I think given the amount of attention it's getting justifies
making more clear than usual that it has not even been considered for
acceptance. (Maybe we could even sneakily suggest that people could show
their support by helping pip/virtualenv/pipenv burn down their bug count
so they're ready to implement it ;) )

At the same time, it's nice to have a PEP be "controversial" for good
reasons for a change. Nobody really hates it, they mostly just misread
it or have different scopes in mind.

Cheers,
Steve
--
Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5VWO5CKLTAGLIZPX5ZTUE4O2I6NKOWQB/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.