Re: PEP 376 & pkgutil - Quick question
Nick Coghlan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADiSq7e8ZczWqQtaVfCwTMOHDyqK=NXjF-DkOOGCf_gNaDtnzQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 06:39, Eric Peterson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks very much for the information, I will take a look at the importlib-metadata project. > > After looking into it further, It seems like many, perhaps all, of the functions in PEP 376 were implemented in distlib: > > https://pypi.org/project/distlib/ > https://bitbucket.org/pypa/distlib Aye, that's the most comprehensive toolkit for packaging related tasks, since it covers many of the never-actually-standardised pieces that were defined by the distutils and setuptools implementations. I've filed https://github.com/python/peps/issues/998 to note that we should clean up that old "Implementation Details" section in PEP 376 to better match what actually happened. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/NKM7YJJ5WFCS7XL4DGBRC2GL5Z5QQMJE/