Re: [Doc-SIG] Double specification of function signatures?

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.devel,gmane.comp.python.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
    Michael> It seems that any documentation or help tool worth its salt
    Michael> should fetch the parameters from the definition and so
    Michael> including them in the docstring should be redundant
    Michael> duplication.

That's my position as well.  Currently we have no way to extract the
function signatures from C code on-the-fly or in a preprocessing step (might
be a good GSoC project), but for functions written in Python I'm of the
opinion the docstrings should not include function signatures.

Skip
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.