Re: epydoc reST markup for stdlib docstrings
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.documentation |
|---|---|
| Organization | Damn Crazy Followers of the Horn |
| Message-ID | <20100414114643.636b7103@heresy> |
On Apr 14, 2010, at 05:37 PM, Michael Foord wrote: >Well, perhaps move this discussion to python-dev with the intent of >creating a PEP and asking for BDFL pronouncement? The two contenders >seem to be numpy format and epydoc format. We seem to have a consensus >that adopting a standard for the standard library is a good idea. > >Once we have settled on a basic format we can thrash out all the >specifics in the PEP. I agree. Right now I've got enough big PEPs on my plate that I'm not willing to take on another one right now. Maybe I've sufficiently tempted/goaded/guilted/excited someone else to though. ;) -Barry _______________________________________________ Doc-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/doc-sig
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLxeNkAAoJEBJutWOnSwa/8i4QAJkJYFVH0sGJhCGgMJTHReU1 okAPC+CZmn9QteFLzIgUevDmH1DEgWnrWHYr9mZ1U/0H+022iRanD0gWmomJHQsf /+NJu4XgvXZ5DfBRmk75f+/oj0CdDm2wqeB/KcIMipGm2dw7zoa0jYoDaPP5wT/8 7t985r8kL5p1QP07hNL//Nedq2dzp5l6PqoGlz/ZZdxpTaiwdoVtKu5y6z6HdKN9 M8gLm5A+KK+JNd5/GOAZmPMpdl4zWNudoLKhk57GSIq5pwQElOgOXo1+yenG6Akz vPaEGQ5WsBVyB9ffsitjZrjgRStRlAw/MuU0asPbIav+qcBWizujK+WW2WQJvOw7 ZxLh1Ae8almfrvro8YLdkrp42OFiisw4nWSIgQh4pfW8H1fT8XJVZTWpZGfKn/5E LIow9UIgiNiF8tcyPrD08E7BiQ5T2v+lxvtOHkYElY04woS6Pan0U7+30Jc0D6NM j9TDWoXQ6GLWg8Kp0t3B0l4zbKvG9KnHDEaHzMebr5kwBGruh8029GU1TwkVIzm+ VFh6mY6nmW17a0qIWJle/B9z+I2mmu56EZ1E6iOCQYbrgwLT3T3CThCvcdx1qsgz rRrRbwq48MmqQy5vdmq+Ttr9+2m3+j+hD7oc1m5axVSFDE6/tLO3uAbPxEo/0HuL 4VRZ/nGNld0ouKN8liF9 =f4dS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----