| Newsgroups |
gmane.comp.python.egenix.user |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
I don't have a compiler installed (I used the binary installer).
I will install one if you want a feedback, otherwise I think that I can, actually, live with 2.0.3 version.
Thank's a lot for your rapid answer and your explanations.
jf gosset
Message d'origine (10/02/2009 18:00) :
>On 2009-02-10 17:41, [email protected] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> That's on Windows platform (tested with 2.5.1 and 2.5.4 versions of python).
>
>In mxDateTime 3.x we're using a more direct way of getting the
>current time which is faster. Apparently, on Windows this doesn't
>provide the full accuracy anymore.
>
>We'll add a fix for this to the next eGenix mx Base release.
>
>As work-around you can comment out the following line in egenix_mx_base.py
>of the distribution to have mxDateTime use the 2.x strategy again:
>
> #define_macros=[('USE_FAST_GETCURRENTTIME', None)],
>
>Some more context:
>
> mx_Extension('mx.DateTime.mxDateTime.mxDateTime',
> ['mx/DateTime/mxDateTime/mxDateTime.c'],
> # If mxDateTime doesn't compile, try removing the next line.
> #define_macros=[('USE_FAST_GETCURRENTTIME', None)],
> #
> include_dirs=['mx/DateTime/mxDateTime'],
> optional_libraries=_mxDateTime_optional_libraries,
> ),
>
>You'll then have to recompile the package using
>
>python setup.py bdist_msi
>
>and install the generated MSI file.
>
>Thanks,
>--
>Marc-Andre Lemburg
>eGenix.com
>
>Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Feb 10 2009)
>>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
>________________________________________________________________________
>
>::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::
>
>
> eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
> D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
> Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
> http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
>
>> Thank's
>> jf
>>
>> Message d'origine (10/02/2009 17:29) émis par (M.-A. Lemburg) :
>>> On 2009-02-10 17:17, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> With the old 2.0.3 version of mx.DateTime, now() returned fraction of seconds so we had 1/100sec accuracy.
>>>> With 3.1.2 version, now() now [!] returns whole integer numbers.
>>>>
>>>> Tested with same version of Python (2.5.4). Just switched mx... package in site-packages
>>>>
>>>> Is it by design or is it a bug?
>>> On which platform are you seeing this problem ?
>>>
>>> mxDateTime does return fractions on Linux:
>>>
>>>>>> from mx.DateTime import now
>>>>>> now()
>>> <mx.DateTime.DateTime object for '2009-02-10 17:26:11.86' at 2b13fe0e78c8>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marc-Andre Lemburg
>>> eGenix.com
>>>
>>> Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Feb 10 2009)
>>>>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>>>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>>>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::
>>>
>>>
>>> eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
>>> D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
>>> http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> eGenix.com User Mailing List http://www.egenix.com/
>> https://www.egenix.com/mailman/listinfo/egenix-users
_______________________________________________________________________
eGenix.com User Mailing List http://www.egenix.com/
https://www.egenix.com/mailman/listinfo/egenix-users