Re: decorating validators, CompoundValidator

>W-Mark Kubacki wrote:
>>
>> Can we introduce a Consecutive/Stepper/Decorating validator or reanimate
>> the CompoundValidator, so the developer can combine decorators? [...]

>From: Ian Bicking [mailto:[email protected]]
>
>I'd like one, I just can't think of the name.  Unfortunately, and not
>quite intentionally, All ended up being in this kind of reversed-order,
>and fixing it would cause problematic compatibility problems elsewhere.
>  Maybe And()?

Pipe() seems intuitive from the point of view of a BASH user. Chain() sounds 
similar to chained_validators, which might be misleading. Sequence(), 
Consecution()?
The very first is my favorite.

The validator should be rather trivial to write. If nobody volunteers I can 
implement it.

-- Mark

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
FormEncode-discuss mailing list
FormEncode-discuss-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/formencode-discuss