Re: can you improve this text-only beginner copy program?
Thomas Passin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/27/2025 1:45 PM, Stefan Ram wrote: > Ethan Carter <[email protected]> wrote or quoted: >> You're right. There's no written statement. The exercise was suggested >> by the teacher while in class. It was something like ``write a program >> that copies text files by getting source and destination via the >> command-line.'' > > Well then, I'd think about using "shutil", e.g., "shutil.copy". > Check it out in "The Python Library Reference"; it's 11.10.1 in > release 3.13.0a0. It sounds like the main point of the exercise may have been to use command line arguments. The Original Post tried to do this in a complicated and clumsy (non-Pythonic) way. Easier and more Pythonic would be to delete the def main() block and then: if __name__ == '__main__': import sys # could import this at start of file if len(sys.argv) == 3: copy(sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2]) else: print(usage(sys.argv[0])) or perhaps easier to read: if __name__ == '__main__': import sys # could import this at start of file try: prog, src, dest = sys.argv except: print(usage(sys.argv[0])) sys.exit(1) # or some other error code copy(src, dest) >> But, yeah, if the Python community doesn't do that, it's all what you >> say. > > Community or no community, in Python, you can have: > > def f( s, S ): > return 2*s+S > > . Should the docs then say, "returns 2*S+S"? > >> PS. Is it just me or there's just us in this used-to-be-very-active >> group? Thanks for being my teacher here. Have a good day! > > Thanks, you too! > > On one hand, many people seem to prefer websites for discussions > nowadays. On the other hand, if I had not responded, probably > someone else would have. >