Re: Python

c186282 <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Mar 2026 20:30:14 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.general
Organization wokiesux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 3/4/26 17:35, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2026 14:09:58 -0700, Peter Flass wrote:
> 
>> On 3/4/26 13:29, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2026-03-04 21:01, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
>>> .
>>>> A man with one clock knows what time it is.  A man with two is
>>>> never quite sure...
>>>
>>> Experimental science would not agree.
>>
>> You would need at least three.
> 
> Three would be better than two, but two is already enough to come up
> with an error estimate on the measurement.

   The rate at which time passes is dependent on
   the amount of mass/gravity/energy where the
   clock is located. That depends on the Earth,
   what's under it, the moon, the sun, the planets,
   nearby galaxies for that matter. As such if you
   have even two clocks, with enough decimal points,
   even on the same shelf they WILL start to diverge.

   Hmm ... now how the two clocks affect each OTHER,
   that could be interesting :-)
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/python-list.python.org