Re: The bake-off
[email protected] Thu, 30 May 2002 13:46:45 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.getopt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[Moore, Paul Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:59:24AM +0100] > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > i came in late to the SIG but it appears that in the last two or three > > month discussion was non-existent. The original SIG-people seem > > to agree on Optik so i respectfully stay out of their way. > > > > It's just a bit frustrating to see that the 'inner pythoneer circles' > > tend to ignore people willing to contribute :-( > > > > They may have good reasons but *complete* lack of communicating them > > is not very motivating (despite http://www.python.org/dev/why.html ) > > I'm pretty much an outsider to the discussions. I've watched them, as I > often need option parsing code, and I'd like to find a "nice" package. But I > tried not to get involved in detail discussions, as I have not (yet) started > using any of the "competing" packages. > > My view of the discussions was: > > 1. There were a number of people who were fairly enthusiastic about Optik > (not just Greg, the author). On the other hand, you seemed alone in your > defence of your package. you must confuse me with someone else! I didn't have any package to defend ... Additionally, I was just refering to *the discussion* and not to package specific things. regards, holger