Re: The Future of Python

phil jones <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.idle
Message-ID <CAP97HnkRntoRMtf1m+FMkjjPJ6FKyw3sL9Hk9FQRz0_Ok+TMqw@mail.gmail.com>
But if I understand correctly, you're using VIDLE not IDLE? Or did I
get that wrong?

On 10 February 2014 23:39, Bruce Sherwood <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I misunderstood, it is because IDLE works very well for my thousands of
> Python newbies.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Feb 10, 2014 6:10 PM, "phil jones" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Bruce : [quote]
>> I have the strong impression, including from Jessica's talk, that IDLE is
>> very objectionable to experienced programmers, and I would say simply that
>> they shouldn't use it.
>> [/quote]
>>
>> To be honest, I interpreted Jessica as saying the opposite. That IDLE was
>> not good enough for the *beginners* in her novice class. And that one of the
>> barriers to entry to python in general was the lack of a good entry level
>> development environment.
>>
>> I don't think this about professional programmers missing "advanced"
>> features.
>>
>> Phil
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.