Re: Current Idle issues

On 8/10/2015 10:44 AM, Tal Einat wrote:
> Indeed, this is great!
>
> Perhaps this could be kept as an online document of some form so that it
> could be kept up-to-date, e.g. a wiki page or a Google doc of some sort?
> Google docs could allow you to control who can edit it, and e.g. allow
> others to comment without actually editing the doc.

With two votes for updated availability, I will think about this.

> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Al Sweigart <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks, this is a great list to consult to before I file new issues.
>     Idle has a big backlog and I don't want to add duplicates.
>
>     On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Terry Reedy <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>         A year or two ago, a couple of people announced a plan for a
>         database of Idle issues on a public site.  I don't remember
>         anything about it later.  Last year, I finally 'bit the bullet'
>         and created the following so I could close duplicates, add
>         myself as nosy to existing issues, and get an overview of what
>         needs to be done.  Perhaps this will help others, but excuse the
>         sloppiness of notes meant to be private.  If it is helpful, I
>         can repost occasionally when significantly changes.  I am hoping
>         it will shrink, though I plan to convert some of the xxxxx
>         entries to real tracker entries.
>         ----------------------------------------------
>
>         A listing of Idle tracker issues, 2015 Aug 6.  Most items are listed
>         under a menu (or configure tab) item, actual or proposed.  A few are
>         listed under idlelib or test.
>
>         * issue has patch to review.
>         # I uploaded patch to finish and commit.
>
>         IDLELIB
>
>         13504 meta-issue (check that each item is a separate issue, and
>         close)


-- 
Terry Jan Reedy