Re: Enhancements to IDLE debugger
Terry Reedy <[email protected]> Sat, 5 Nov 2016 22:34:46 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.idle |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/5/2016 7:19 PM, Irv Kalb wrote: > This is all great feedback! > > My bugs.python.org userid is: IrvKalb > > As I am new to the world of IDLE development, do changes you are > making (or considering), also make it into a release for Python > 2.7.x? While there is greater latitude for backporting IDLE changes than for the rest of the stdlib, I have pretty much stopped patching 2.7. I posted why last January (but have made a few changes since). 1. 2.7 is used by people who want stability, not change. 2. It is too hard to adequately test. A year ago I introduced bug into 2.7 as a result. A new third reason is that with 3.6, I can and have started using the ttk widgets introduced a decade ago. When I redo the debugger window, I will switch it to ttk, as I already have done, am doing, or will do with everything else. > My schools still install 2.7 for use in all of our classes. Then they must want stability over enhancement ;-). -- Terry Jan Reedy