Re: PIL 1.1.6 ImageFile.Parser destroys data for PngImagePlugin

Fredrik Lundh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.image
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the detailed analysis.  The fix in 1.1.7 is slightly
different from the one you propose:

    http://hg.effbot.org/pil-2009-raclette/changeset/fe4688f15fed/

Not sure why the code considers it important to close the file at that
point; I'll take another look at a look at the code and the history of
that file when I find the time.

</F>

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Nils Olaf de Reus
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I am experiencing inconvenience from the behaviour of ImageFile.py in
> PIL 1.1.6 when attempting to read in a PNG image.
>
> The method I see documented to retreive an image through ImageFile is by
> invoking close() on the ImageFile.Parser, like this.
>
>>>> import ImageFile
>>>> import urllib
>>>>
>>>> f = urllib.urlopen('<url-path-to-png-file>')
>>>>
>>>> p = ImageFile.Parser()
>>>>
>>>> while True:
> ...     s = f.read(1024)
> ...     if not s:
> ...         break
> ...     p.feed(s)
> ...
>>>> im = p.close()
>
> The way ImageFile.Parser works, it creates an ImageFile._ParserFile to
> act as a file, and calls Image.open() on that. So far so good, and this
> results in a valid png image object.. for a very brief moment, because
> in the 'finally' section immediately after, it calls close() on that
> ImageFile._ParserFile.
>
> The definition of close() in ImageFile._ParserFile is as follows:
>
>    def close(self):
>        self.data = self.offset = None
>
> But PngImagePlugin does not copy data on opening - it just keeps a
> reference to the source. So this just now destroyed the data on the
> object that PngImagePlugin is still referring to as the location of its
> IDAT chunks.. not a bright move, because we have now created a condition
> where from the point of view of the PngImagePlugin, self.fp is an
> ImageFile._ParserFile instance, and self.fp.data is None.
>
> Which means that as soon as we try to do anything with that image,
> PngImagePlugin is going to be firing read() instructions at its self.fp,
> which in turn blindly trusts that its self.data supports __getitem__()..
> and predictably, there is our Traceback:
>
>>>> im.convert('RGB')
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PIL/Image.py", line 653, in
> convert
>    self.load()
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PIL/ImageFile.py", line 189, in
> load
>    s = read(self.decodermaxblock)
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PIL/PngImagePlugin.py", line
> 365, in load_read
>    return self.fp.read(bytes)
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PIL/ImageFile.py", line 300, in
> read
>    data = self.data[pos:pos+bytes]
> TypeError: 'NoneType' object is unsubscriptable
>
>
> I am currently working around the issue by creating my own
> ImageFile._ParserFile object that avoids having its data None'd.
>
>>>> import ImageFile
>>>> import urllib
>>>>
>>>> f = urllib.urlopen('<url-path-to-png-file>')
>>>>
>>>> p = ImageFile.Parser()
>>>>
>>>> while True:
> ...     s = f.read(1024)
> ...     if not s:
> ...         break
> ...     p.feed(s)
> ...
>>>> virtualfile = ImageFile._ParserFile(p.data)
>>>> im = Image.open(virtualfile)
>>>> p.close()
>>>> im.convert('RGB')
> <Image.Image instance at 0x2b890f5cff80>
>
>
> This works great -just need to keep the virtualfile around until I'm
> really done with it- but obviously I am not happy having to use what is
> supposed to be an internal from ImageFile.
>
> >From where I stand, the sensible thing would be to eliminate these two
> lines from ImageFile.Parser.close():
>
>            finally:
>                fp.close() # explicitly close the virtual file
>
> ..except that because of the comment, I must assume that there is a
> reason to be doing this. Could someone please shed light on why it is
> necessary to explicitly close fp there?
>
> Kind regards,
>  Nils Olaf de Reus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Image-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
>
_______________________________________________
Image-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.