Re: PIL PNG encoding performance
Oliver Tonnhofer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.image |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04.03.2010, at 14:31, Oliver Tonnhofer wrote: > Any opinions or suggestions on that? I would do a fork on bitbucket > then and start hacking. Ok, I just started :) I added compress_level and compress_type as save options for png files. The default behaviour is identical to 1.1.7. Anyone care to review? http://bitbucket.org/olt/pil-117/changeset/8d4661695edd/ I load the ZLIB constants (Z_RLE, etc) into the _imaging module and then into Image. I'm not sure if that's OK, or if I should create some new constant values. I did not prefix the constants, but maybe it is time to start with it. BILINEAR, RLE, FLOYDSTEINBERG, ADAPTIVE, ... it's getting a bit confusing. Regards, Oliver _______________________________________________ Image-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig