Re: Radius bug with GaussianBlur
Fredrik Lundh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.image |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Stani <[email protected]> wrote: > Strange indeed. The same is true for UnsharpMask: More silly than strange, I'd say -- looks like a cut-and-paste-propagated typo that weren't caught by the (rather shallow) filter tests. Trivial patch here: http://hg.effbot.org/pil-2009-raclette/changeset/ee5c367a6a75 Thanks /F > class UnsharpMask(Filter): > name = "UnsharpMask" > > def __init__(self, radius=2, percent=150, threshold=3): > self.radius = 2 > self.percent = percent > self.threshold = threshold > def filter(self, image): > return image.unsharp_mask(self.radius, self.percent, self.threshold) > > http://svn.effbot.org/public/tags/pil-1.1.7a1-20090317/PIL/ImageFilter.py > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Tiberio Uricchio <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> i just wanted to report a simple bug in ImageFilter.GaussianBlur: >> >> class GaussianBlur(Filter): >> name = "GaussianBlur" >> >> def __init__(self, radius=2): >> self.radius = 2 >> >> def filter(self, image): >> return image.gaussian_blur(self.radius) >> >> As you can see, radius is always fixed at value 2 instead of using the >> argument value. >> >> Tiberio >> _______________________________________________ >> Image-SIG maillist - [email protected] >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig >> > > > > -- > Phatch Photo Batch Processor - http://photobatch.stani.be > SPE Python IDE - http://pythonide.stani.be > _______________________________________________ > Image-SIG maillist - [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig > _______________________________________________ Image-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig