Re: Locate The Center of WhiteDot from a Image

Alec Bennett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.image
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I need to do this too. Could you possibly keep the list updated with your
findings?



On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Narendra Sisodiya <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Christopher Barker <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On 1/7/11 10:14 AM, Narendra Sisodiya wrote:
>>
>>> This Code Look for bounding box which I am calculating by scanning each
>>> row and column one by one. If I am finding any white pixel, I am
>>> including it into my bounding box.
>>>
>>
>>  1) there may a change that 2 or more WhiteDOT may present. One is Big
>>> whiedot and other are very smaller whitedot(just 2-3 pixel) near to this
>>> Big whitedot.
>>>
>>
>> Not sure about this one off the top of myhead, but I"d suspect some
>> smoothing may take care of it.
>>
>>
>>  I am applying this
>>> algorithm on every frame taken from camera at 2fps. So I want a high
>>> speed algorithm. PIL must be having some function or trick to do it.
>>>
>>
>> The Image..getbbox() method should do it.
>>
>>
> Thanks, I tried getbbox on wrong image. Now I am using getbbox and I am
> getting proper result that too very fast.
>
>
>> If you need more math, numpy can help. Somethign like:
>>
>> a = np.asarray(PIL_image)
>> background_color = 0
>> rows, cols = np.where(a <> background_color) # background color a uint32
>> BB = (rows.min(), rows.max(), cols.min(), cols.max())
>>
>
>
> I am unable to get what that code means ?
> May you explain how I can use above code with getbbox ? Or the above code
> using NumPy is alternate of getbbox method ?
> IF yes, then which will be the faster ?
>
> PS: I have looked at centroid algorithm, It is again going at pixel level
> and that will be slow. My application will become better with faster
> centroid algorithm.
>
>
> Also I have another question !
> I am grabbing image from camera using opencv-python. How we can compare
> python PIL with OpenCV ? My guess that PIL will is faster then opencv
> library ?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Image-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
>
>

_______________________________________________
Image-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/image-sig
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.