Re: PEP 420 issue: extend_path

On 05/10/2012 09:56 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Eric V. Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Feel free to wordsmith it.
> 
> Only minor quibbles:
> 
> "load a regular package" -> "load a module or self-contained package"
> (when we get a loader, we don't know if it's for a module or a
> package, and I also prefer "self-contained package" over "regular
> package", since it's more future proof terminology)

For this particular edit, I stuck with "regular package". It's defined
in the PEP, so I don't think it's confusing (or at least no more
confusing that other instances of the term). I might consider a
wholesale replacement in the PEP at a later date.

> "will be a list containing only" -> "will contain only"

Fixed.

Thanks!
Eric.