Re: PEP 451: Big update.
Eric Snow <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:13:02 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.import |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALFfu7CT3AOoD0CrDe0FD1iSeFLc3nyNYE+UFTYYmgmb1MFv1w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I preferred the "prepare_module" name when I thought the extension > loader returned the cached module object directly. It doesn't, it returns a > copy, so "create_module" is fine. > Cool. > Also agreed on deferring reload behavioural improvements to a separate PEP. > Sounds good. > As noted in my other email, I think an advisory "this isn't going to work" > API is a better idea now, since even pure Python modules don't always > support reloading. > What do you mean by "advisory" API? > And +1 to "loader_state" as the helper attribute name. > That's settled then! Thanks for the feedback. -eric _______________________________________________ Import-SIG mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/import-sig