Re: latest update of PEP 451

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Eric Snow <[email protected]>wrote:

> FYI, I've updated the PEP and hope to wrap up an initial patch in the
> next day or two.  Unless anyone here objects, once I have the patch up
> I'm going to post the PEP to python-dev and try to get everything
> wrapped up ASAP (3.4-alpha4 is on Oct.20).
>
> If that goes smoothly, does anyone think it will be a bad idea to try
> to get the .ref file PEP in for 3.4?  While beta1 is in less than 2
> months, the PEP is smaller, less invasive, we'd already hashed out the
> details, and ModuleSpec addresses the implementation issue we had.
> The only roadblock that I see is my crazy schedule, but given where we
> left .ref files, I think it is doable.  With that in mind, once I've
> pushed PEP 451 to python-dev I'll probably revisit the .ref PEP, get
> it a number, and crank on the implementation.  Thoughts?
>

If you can still turn out a quality PEP then I don't see any explicit issue.

-Brett


>
> -eric
>
> p.s. I've given up on C OrderedDict and friends for 3.4 in favor of
> these 2 import PEPS.  They're worth it though.  Thanks for convincing
> me to work on them, Nick! :)
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Brett Cannon <[email protected]> wrote:
> [snipped feedback]
> _______________________________________________
> Import-SIG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/import-sig
>

_______________________________________________
Import-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/import-sig