Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
"Eric V. Smith" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.import |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/2/2012 3:17 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> About the only question I have is: Is everyone okay with the changes to
>> the finders, described in the PEP?
>
> It looks good to me. It's a somewhat surprising change, but I can see no
> flaw in it.
Surprising in that any change to find_module is needed, or surprising
that it now returns one of {None, loader, str}?
If it's the latter: yeah, it's a little strange. But find_module knows
something that the caller needs to be told. It seemed easiest to add
another possible return type. Any other suggestions?
Eric.