Re: PEP 489: Redesigning extension module loading

Nick Coghlan schrieb am 16.04.2015 um 22:48:
> On 16 Apr 2015 07:05, "Petr Viktorin" wrote:
>> There's a question I need help with: go with a new PyModuleDesc
>> structure, or stick with PyModuleDef and repurpose a currently unused
>> member. You can find the details in the text itself.
> 
> I think the PEP makes a decent case for:
> 
> * m_reload being an essentially unimplementable idea
> * swapping it out for a slots array pointer being a way to migrate to an
> extensible approach to module declarations without needing a new struct
> definition in the C API (and associated new functions to work with that
> struct).
> 
> That means I'm inclined to favour the "modify PyModuleDef" variant.

+1, but I think the decision should be done over on python-dev.

Stefan