Re: PEP 489: Multi-phase extension module initialization; version 5
Petr Viktorin <[email protected]> Mon, 18 May 2015 17:07:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.import |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+=+wqCKCNs--v_LzeNRrgVnsNwMgRAQUubnW9D4YY8iqQxy3w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, 18 May 2015 16:02:37 +0200 > Petr Viktorin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've sent the latest update of PEP 489 to the editors. I am quite happy >> with how it turned out, and I don't expect too many further changes. > > I'm surprised the PEP still mentions PyModule_GetState. Shouldn't it be > discouraged in favour of custom module object fields? No, it's the other way around -- we want to discourage using custom module subclasses; most modules should just customize the exec phase.