Re: PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages

Nick Coghlan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.import
Message-ID <CADiSq7cCJQOENx64DOKeJ7WdhDu89jNQXOKGy4MZbgyNwDABoQ@mail.gmail.com>
I'd still prefer to just officially bless the existing "<whatever>"
convention for non-filesystem imports over encouraging type checks on
__loader__ or defining a new introspection interface for loaders.

If we say "this is the stdlib convention" people are going to start using
the same check as is now used in traceback.py

The precedent is there with code objects, and I think it's a good example
to follow.

Cheers,
Nick.

--
Sent from my phone, thus the relative brevity :)

_______________________________________________
Import-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/import-sig
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.