Re: IPCompleter.limit_to__all__ = True alternative
Hugo Gagnon <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:47:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.ipython.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1499892424.1394182.1039002912.1CB2772D@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
Okay. I'd just like to point out that I find a use to it and unless the new completion machinery offers an alternative I see no reason to deprecate it. -- Hugo Gagnon On Wed, Jul 12, 2017, at 10:24, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > Hi Hugo, > > I don't think there is one; the idea is that with the new completion > machinery, we can do smarter prioritisation of completions, and therefore > we don't need as much complexity for showing and hiding different bits. I > know the completion improvements are still a bit ropey at present, though. > > Best wishes, > Thomas > > On 5 July 2017 at 19:15, Hugo Gagnon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > What is the alternative to "IPCompleter.limit_to__all__ = True"? I use > > IPython 5.3.0. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Hugo Gagnon > > _______________________________________________ > > IPython-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > IPython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev