Re: Re: Another try at a Python Web SIG?
Bill Janssen <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:51:56 PDT
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.meta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <03Oct16.155201pdt."58611"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com> |
Holger Krekel writes: > do you want to come up with API definitions without actually > implementing the stuff? Or what exactly do you mean with "a plan"? > Maybe I am too careful here but i don't know what happens if we > discuss "a plan" for six month :-) I'd like to come up with a work plan, with names and timelines/milestones assigned to it. If we could do that, we could then extend the charter to get the work done. My feeling is that if we can't come to some agreement on what work to do, there's no point in having a SIG -- individual contributors might as well mail patches and modules to python-dev. On the other hand, I'd expect most of the contributors would be either already sitting on most of the code they would need, to accomplish what they had signed up for, or have a very clear idea of what they were going to do to achieve it. Arguments about "let's do this" are much more convincing (to me) if they also contain "See, here's how I did it, isn't it pretty?" :-). Bill _______________________________________________ Meta-sig maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/meta-sig